CBAM may not work without policy adopted for steel exporters: webinar

The European Commission’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism – currently at the stage of a proposal being discussed by the European Parliament – could be counterproductive if it doesn’t provide a solution for EU exporters of steel and other products impacted, said speakers on a virtual webinar organized by Euractiv, a Brussel-based policy events organizer, on Feb 9.

It’s currently unclear whether exporters will be able to apply for continued free allocations under the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) or rebates as from 2030, and what is acceptable under World Trade Organisation rules, said Oliver Sartor, senior adviser, industry, at Agora Energiewende, a Germany-based energy industry thinktank. Some EU industrial sectors export 25% of their production, and companies will be exposed if a dedicated export protection system isn’t put in place, he said.

“We need solutions for exports,” said Alex Eggert, director general of European steel association Eurofer. “The European steel industry exports 20 million mt every year, worth almost Eur20 billion, and if it’s not done right we could lose these exports over time as this cannot all be put on the internal market.”

There is the risk of capacity reductions and structural problems in the EU steel industry if no provision is made for exporters, he said. “We should look into reducing emissions, not jobs.”

The CBAM needs to be totally effective before free allocations are phased out, Eggert underscored. The carbon levy at the border will start only in 2026 and it may take 2-3 years to see whether it is working, so it is important to keep free allocation at the same level it is today during this period, Eggert said. According to current proposals the free ETS allowances will be phased out from 2026, over a 10-year period during which the CBAM will be progressively introduced, in line with WTO principles.

Eurofer is asking both the EU Member States and the European Parliament to ascertain that the system really works before ETS free allocations are phased out to prevent carbon leakage as well as higher export costs, he added.

Eurofer estimates the additional direct carbon costs for the steel industry – with the combined effect of the CBAM and the free allocation phase out – will be of nearly Eur14 billion ($16 billion) in 2030.

Eggert added that Eurofer’s proposal to keep free allocations at the current level supports the entire steel industry chain, including downstream industry, and that the association is working with its lawyers to see how this may be achieved to be compatible with WTO rules.

Maria Elena Scoppio, the EC’s director of indirect taxation and tax administration, described the CBAM as “the external impact of ETS,” designed to tax a product’s carbon content rather than exclude products from certain countries and is “purely a climate-regulatory instrument.”

Judith Kirton-Darling, deputy general secretary of global trade union organization IndustriAll, said it is important to make sure that the CBAM does not end up penalizing the least developed countries. IndustriAll supports greater funding from the ETS going into the Just Transition and Innovation funds, taking the social dimension into account, and potentially also to be used partially outside Europe.

Carbon price ‘game-changer’

Current carbon prices at near Eur100/mt are a “game changer” for EU industries including steel, boosting costs, webinar participants agreed. Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, a member of the European Parliament, said that while carbon at this price level is a “challenge” it is also a signal to investors seeking a stable price which will give an indication of what decarbonization and equipment costs may be, and will also help boost incomings to the modernization and innovation funds. “We’re not very surprised at this price,” she said.

Eurofer’s Eggert said he sees free allocation as key to helping the EU steel industry to boost its decarbonization efforts, noting that before 2018 the carbon price of less of Eur10/mt “did not help to decarbonize the industry.” The industry is also studying the exact definition of what “green steel” is, to launch a methodology, while green steel is already being produced by the sector, he said.

The CBAM will measure only direct emissions of a product, said the EC’s Scoppio.

Importers will need to prove if carbon costs were levied in the country of origin to be able to lower the level of the CBAM applied, she said.

Webinar participants agreed that it would be excessively difficult to calculate products’ indirect emissions under the scope of the CBAM at the current stage. However, if indirect emissions aren’t eventually included in the mechanism, this could lead to circumvention, Sartor claimed.

— Diana Kinch and Annalisa Villa

Voestalpine passes rising costs on to steel prices

Voestalpine Group achieved very good profit in the three fiscal quarters that ended on 31 December but notes it was not left unhurt by the surge in raw materials and energy costs.

“The question here is, to what extent we can forward the prices to the market,” chief executive Herbert Eibensteiner said during a conference call on Wednesday attended by Kallanish. He let on that the company is optimistic it can indeed hand down the additional costs in its steel product prices, but was not specific about the extent.

The “enormous surge” in energy costs came especially in the third fiscal quarter, so Eibensteiner’s comment implies that prices, especially on the spot market, should increase. He did not say so explicitly, and referred to the company’s big share of long-term contracts. “There will be a time lag, owed to the different durations of the contracts,” he said.

Regarding the largest sector with such contracts, the automotive industry, voestalpine believes that production at carmakers has bottomed out. “The demand for cars is undiminished,” and the trough was, after all “not due to a lack of demand, but of supply”, Eibensteiner pointed out.

According to the company’s Q3 report, its steel prices climbed through to the end of the reporting period, due to its specific contracting structure. Its direct reduction plant in Texas, for example, profited from good demand for steel in North America.

Christian Koehl Germany

Italian sections suppliers hold prices despite weak demand

Italian sections prices are flattening month-on-month, while sales activity is sluggish mostly due to the current high level of prices putting off buyers, Kallanish hears.

The largest sections mill in the market is quoting and obtaining orders at €670-680/tonne ($766-777) for the first category of beams. Prices increase by €20/t for each subsequent category. Contract prices remain this week at €670-675/t base ex-works. Including €380-390/t average size extras, contract prices for the first category of sections are hovering at €1,050-1,070/t ex-works, depending on volumes, sources suggest.

Meanwhile, merchant bar prices are also flattening compared to last week at €510-520/t base ex-works. Including size extras, values stand at €930-940/t ex-works. Sellers are unwilling to negotiate despite the weak demand, particularly for merchant bar. Buyers continue to purchase back-to-back. In January, sellers reported some restocking as distributors reached the end of last year with low stocks.

Distributors say that because of the current high prices, activity downstream is slow and many end-users are putting off their purchases or changing selling strategies.

Natalia Capra France

Rising carbon costs seen hurting EU export competitiveness

The continued increase in Emissions Trading System (ETS) costs for European steelmakers is raising further concerns over the future of European steel exports in the coming years.

In a webinar organised this week by Euractiv, Axel Eggert, director general of Eurofer, said current plans to phase out ETS free allocations as the market prepares for the implementation of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) could significantly hamper European steel exports.

“European steelmakers export some 20 million tonnes of steel every year; we need to make sure we are not losing these exports going forward,” he warned at the meeting attended by Kallanish. The steel sector is already suffering from a shortage and high costs of ETS carbon permits, he continued, adding that phasing out free allocations by 2023 will increase the pressure further.

Eggert noted that a significant reduction of exports could lead to increasing oversupply of steel within Europe and the need to reduce output and close capacities.

Members of the European Parliament participating on the same Euractiv panel confirmed that risks exist for European exports and that a solution needs to be found to secure the competitiveness of European exporters in the global market.

ETS prices have in February surpassed the level of €95/tonne ($109). In February 2021, prices stood at €38-40/t. The European Commission plans to gradually phase out ETS free allocations as CBAM is implemented during 2023-2035. The phaseout of free allocations is worrying European steelmakers.

Emma Wiesner, Member of the European Parliament, nevertheless stressed that if the free allocation phaseout is slowed down or stopped, there is a risk of not rewarding the frontrunners in the current transition towards carbon-free industrial production and steelmaking.

Emanuele Norsa Italy