German machinery industry registers tepid spring improvement

Germany’s mechanical engineering industry saw a gentle increase in orders in the first four months of the year, but the overall picture does yet indicate a rebound from the long-term lull.

In the first quarter, the companies in this sector lifted orders by 4% in comparison with Q1 2025, Kallanish learns from their federation VDMA. The orders came mainly from abroad, rising 6% year-on-year, while domestic order activity actually suffered another dip, by 2% y-o-y.

VDMA also cautions that the positive quarterly figure is based on an irregularly strong intake in March. After two disappointing months, March saw an increase of 27% y-o-y, boosted by orders for large plant-building projects. “Such special effects are welcome, but they paint a rosier picture than the reality, and do not signal a broad upswing,” says VDMA chief economist Johannes Gernandt.

He notes the wars in the Gulf region and in Ukraine, as well as US protectionism are keeping industries away from making investments into production equipment. He also criticises the German government, which he says after one year in office has stood out more for internal disagreements, rather than for providing conditions that improve German machinery makers’ international competitiveness.

The mixed picture for the industry continued into April. Order intake was 4% higher than in the corresponding 2025 month. But again, foreign orders went up 8%, while domestic orders remained 7% below April 2025.

Gernandt therefore reiterates the industry’s demands to the government. “We need lower taxes for companies, more flexibility with the workforce, an alleviation of costs for bureaucracy, and a reform of the social insurance system,” he says.

 

Author: Christian Koehl

Kallanish Logo

kallanish.com

 

Germany’s crude steel production maintained its growth in May

Germany’s crude steel production increased by approximately 7% in May 2026 compared to the same month last year.
According to the German Steel Federation (Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl), Germany’s crude steel production increased by approximately 7% year on year to 3.2 million mt in May 2026. This marked the fifth consecutive month of growth in the country’s crude steel output. In the January-May period, total crude steel production rose by around 9% compared to the same period of the previous year.
By production route, oxygen steel production via the blast furnace route recorded a strong performance in May, increasing by 15% year on year. In contrast, electric steel production based on scrap and electricity declined by approximately 8%. However, the decrease was largely attributed to the high production levels recorded in May 2025, which created a challenging base effect.
Despite the positive trend observed in recent months, the industry remains cautious. The annualized production forecast currently stands at approximately 37.7 million mt. Remaining below the 40 million mt threshold indicates that capacity utilization rates have yet to reach the desired levels.

Author: SteelRadar Editorial Team

SteelRadar Logo

steelradar.com

Liberty Galați steel complex tender concludes without bids, search for investors continues

A new stage has been reached in the sale process of Liberty Galați Steel Complex and its pipe division in Romania.
The consortium of insolvency administrators, Euro Insol and CITR, announced that the current tender round held today has been concluded, while the process of selecting a strategic investor is still ongoing.
The open auction, with a starting price set at €463 million, followed an extensive outreach and engagement process aimed at potential strategic investors across the global steel industry. However, the tender ended without any binding offers being submitted.
Commenting on the process, Euro Insol Chairman Remus Borza stated that discussions with interested investors are still ongoing, and efforts are being made together with creditors to identify the most suitable solution framework. He emphasized that the asset holds not only economic but also significant social importance, underlining that the future of thousands of employees and the local community depends on the outcome of the process.
CITR CEO Paul-Dieter Cîrlănaru noted that the five-month process has revealed an important reality, highlighting that there is tangible investor interest and advanced discussions have taken place with multiple parties. He stressed that the absence of bids does not necessarily indicate a lack of interest, adding that the process is not over. He further stated that responsibilities toward creditors, employees, and the Galați region remain, and that all options are being evaluated in light of continued pressure in the European steel market.
As part of the ongoing process, potential investors have been provided access to all necessary information to allow a detailed assessment of the opportunity.
Meanwhile, the asset monetization process has been supported by a broad international marketing campaign.

Author: SteelRadar Editorial Team

SteelRadar Logo

steelradar.com

Steel: a burning issue of sovereignty

As Brussels seeks to secure its transatlantic trade relations, the continent’s leading steel producers are calling for a reform of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) in order to safeguard their competitiveness.

Faced with the need to drastically reduce its carbon emissions whilst contending with ever more aggressive international competition, the steel industry once again epitomises Europe’s contradictions.

Two separate cases highlight this. On the one hand, the European Parliament has given the green light to the implementation of the tariff commitments agreed between the European Union and the United States under the Turnberry Agreement.

On the other hand, ArcelorMittal, Thyssenkrupp Steel and Voestalpine – which together account for nearly 60% of integrated steel production in Europe – are calling for a reform of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS). Despite their different natures, these two initiatives share a common concern: to preserve European production capacity against a backdrop of profound transformation in the global economy.

Europe is strengthening its trade safeguards

The agreement reached with Washington aims to ease several years of trade tensions and provide greater certainty for businesses on both sides of the Atlantic. However, Brussels was not prepared to open up its market without receiving something in return. The texts adopted include, in particular, safeguard mechanisms enabling the EU to respond in the event of a significant trade imbalance. They also introduce clauses suspending tariff preferences should the United States maintain certain customs barriers on products derived from European steel and aluminium.

For the European institutions, the challenge is clear: to promote trade whilst ensuring that European industry is not undermined by asymmetrical trade practices. This approach is part of a broader shift in European economic policy. In the face of the resurgence of industrial policies in the United States and China, competitiveness has once again become a strategic priority in Brussels.

Decarbonisation at the right pace

It is precisely on this issue of competitiveness that the major European steelmakers have chosen to raise their concerns with European decision-makers. In their joint statement, ArcelorMittal, Thyssenkrupp Steel and Voestalpine do not dispute the EU’s climate targets. All have made significant investments in production technologies that emit less CO2. Their concern relates more to the gap between regulatory ambitions and industrial realities.

With green hydrogen still being expensive, electricity prices among the highest in the world and inadequate carbon capture infrastructure, the conditions for competitive decarbonisation have not yet been met for these three steelmakers. As the cost of carbon continues to rise, these three companies fear that this situation will put European producers at a disadvantage compared with competitors subject to less stringent constraints. This brings with it all the associated risks in terms of industrial sovereignty.

They are therefore calling for a temporary suspension of the increase in ETS costs – with prices remaining at current levels until the key drivers of economically viable decarbonisation are in place – support for businesses embarking on decarbonisation, and border measures to ensure a level playing field in international competition.

Behind these two issues lies a more fundamental question: what role does Europe still wish to play in the global industry of the future?

paperjam.lu

Nordwest Handel lifts steel tonnages, revenue

Nordwest Handel, through its steel division Phoenix, lifted the turnover of its steel products in 2025, after two years of decline, and has continued that trend into this year so far. 

As one of Germany’s big purchasing cooperatives for hardware, sanitary equipment, construction materials and steel, Nordwest Handel achieved total revenues of €4.65 billion ($5.39 billion) in 2025, broadly on par with the previous year.

In terms of volumes, steel is the cooperative’s biggest divisions, with revenues of €1.56 billion, marking an increase of 3.2% year-on-year. In terms of volume, Phoenix handled 1.64 million tonnes of steel for its member companies, rising by 1.6% from 2024.

It its report, Nordwest notes that the increase occurred mainly in the first half of the year, while the second half saw a negative development with a year-on-year drop of 3.3%.

It adds that the overall positive development in the first half resulted both from an increase in sales volume and from a higher average price level over the year.

The increase of volumes was more pronounced in the first half, Kallanish hears from the head of the Phoenix division, Claudio Kemper. He attributes this to higher demand for rebar, which accounts for more than half of Nordwest’s steel sales and benefited from a mild recovery in construction activity.  He believes that the second half saw the reservation of orders due to insecurities in view of the upcoming CBAM regulation.

In the first quarter of the current year, Phoenix reported a y-o-y increase of 6.5% over an already strong Q1 in 2025, achieving revenues of €419 million. The unit represents more than 100 steel buying companies in Germany.

Author: Christian Koehl

Kallanish Logo

kallanish.com

Thyssenkrupp to float materials division tk accelis

Thyssenkrupp steel distribution division tk accelis – formerly thyssenkrupp Materials Services – is to be spun-off and listed on the stock exchange.

The division has 15,500 employees, around 250,000 customers worldwide, and generates revenue of €11.4 billion ($13.2 billion), with 7.6 million tonnes of material sold in the 2024/25 fiscal year.

It emerged on the market under the new brand just a few days ago, which was the first step on the path towards independence (see Kallanish 11 June 2026). According to the parent group, tk accelis benefits from a strong position in fast-growing industries such as aviation, defence, and data centres, and therefore has a strong operating base for its next step on the capital markets.

The plans involve transferring a 49% minority interest to the shareholders of thyssenkrupp AG in proportion to their interest in thyssenkrupp AG and listing the shares on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The spin-off requires the approval of an extraordinary general meeting, projected for 7 August. If the general meeting approves the resolution, thyssenkrupp will retain a majority stake even after the spin-off. Tk accelis would then remain a fully consolidated company within thyssenkrupp, the group states.

“Tk accelis has made impressive progress in recent years. Its ceo, Ilse Henne, and her team are systematically positioning the company as a fully integrated materials distributor and powerful supply chain service provider,” says thyssenkrupp AG chief executive Miguel López. “Now is the right time to take the next step and establish tk accelis as an independent company.”

Author: Christian Koehl

Kallanish Logo

kallanish.com

EU steelmakers call for ETS cost freeze

Europe’s leading steelmakers have called on European policymakers to stop Emissions Trading System (ETS) cost escalation until companies have solid business cases for transformation investments.

The European Commission is due to present its eagerly awaited ETS review in July, Kallanish notes.

In a letter addressed to European Council President António Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the firms, including ArcelorMittal, thyssenkrupp, voestalpine, Moravia Steel and Vitkovice Steel, demand “decisive intervention” to arrest ETS costs. This includes recalibration of ETS free allocations, benchmark methodologies and values, CBAM factor and the Cross-Sectoral Correction Factor (CSCF).

“Further conditionalities to free allocation as currently discussed must be avoided as this would weaken the intended carbon-leakage prevention,” the firms say.

This intervention must allow firms to build solid business cases for transformation investments, supported by “comprehensive and reliable policies” to incentivise the uptake of low-carbon and circular products, they add. ETS revenues should also be “channelled into accessible, technology-neutral industrial transformation support linked to verified emissions reductions.”

“The ETS no longer reflects current global realities. Europe is effectively acting alone in imposing rapidly rising carbon costs on its industry,” the letter asserts. Meanwhile, the conditions required for industrial transformation are not in place, with critical infrastructure for energy, CO2, hydrogen and CCS missing or insufficient. Investment frameworks are unreliable, and customer demand and willingness to pay for low-carbon products are low, the signatories note.

CBAM remains untested and leaves downstream industries exposed, they add.

“If current policies continue, rising carbon costs will be passed on value chains, triggering downstream carbon leakage, compressing margins, scaling back production and accelerating plant closures. The consequences – job losses, reduced investment, and weakening economic growth – are foreseeable,” the letter reads.

“Time is running out. Decisive and immediate policy correction is required to preserve Europe’s industrial foundation and enable a credible path to transformation,” it concludes.

Author: Adam Smith

Kallanish Logo

kallanish.com

German recycling associations BDSV and VDM unite to form Circular Metal Association

The German Steel Recycling and Disposal Association (BDSV) and the German Association of Metal Traders and Recyclers (VDM) have announced that they have signed a merger agreement, establishing the legal foundation for the creation of the Circular Metal Association (CMA).

The new organization will serve as the unified representative of Germany’s steel and metal recycling industry at national, European and international levels.

Merger expected to take effect in coming weeks

The merger will become effective once it is registered in the association register, a process that is expected to be completed in the coming weeks. Until then, both organizations will continue operating under their existing structures.

Following registration, BDSV and VDM will cease to exist as independent legal entities, with all rights, obligations and memberships transferred to the CMA.

CMA to represent the full recycling value chain

The Circular Metal Association will represent the entire value chain of steel and metal recycling, including collection, processing, trading and supply to the metalworking industry. Its scope will also cover the trade of primary metals, ferroalloys and special metals.

According to the associations, the CMA aims to strengthen the sector’s representation before German policymakers as well as European institutions, including the European Parliament and the European Commission. The organization will also represent the industry within international bodies such as Recycling Europe and the Bureau of International Recycling (BIR).

Author: SteelOrbis

SteelOrbis Logo

steelorbis.com

Trading activity in European steel HRC market remains slow on high stocks, uncertainty

The European market for steel hot-rolled coil remained slow on Monday June 15, mainly due to uncertainty caused by the imminent imposition of a new safeguarding regime. Some demand appears only from buyers who need to restock before the start of the summer holiday period, while stocks are predominantly high, sources told Fastmarkets.

The market is affected by “uncertainty about Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), new quota, increasing energy costs due to [conflict between Iran and the US]; and we are close to summer holidays, so a big improvement is not likely before the summer,” one trader said.

In Northern Europe, offers of material scheduled for delivery in late July-September were heard within the range of €710-720 ($821.48-833.05) per tonne ex-works. Meanwhile, the workable level was estimated at €680-700 per tonne ex-works.

Fastmarkets’ daily steel hot-rolled coil index domestic, exw Northern Europe was calculated at €692.50 ($801.24) per tonne on June 15, up by €7.29 per tonne from €685.21 per tonne on June 12.

The index was slightly up by €0.50 per tonne week on week and up by €8.75 per tonne month on month.

In Italy, offers varied within the range of €685-695 per tonne ex-works, with indications of tradable levels within the range of €680-685 per tonne ex-works. For large tonnages, the workable level was reported at €675 per tonne ex-works.

“There was some activity because some buyers wanted to restock before the start of summer holidays — in southern Europe it normally starts earlier than in Northern [Europe],” another trader said. “People want to have some stocks for the future because an increase in prices is possible. Mills are pushing prices up.”

Fastmarkets’ daily steel hot-rolled coil index domestic, exw Italy was calculated at €684.50 per tonne on June 15, down by €3.00 per tonne from €687.50 per tonne on June 12.

The index was up by €3.67 per tonne week on week and down by €0.33 per tonne month on month.

Author: Vlada Novokreshchenova

Fastmarkets Logo

fastmarkets.com

Recycling Europe, EEB and FEAD call for a Green Steel Label

Recycling Europe, the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), and the European Waste Management Association (FEAD) have issued a joint statement on the establishment of a Green Steel Label under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR).
The statement emphasizes that a science-based and ambitious methodology is essential for the decarbonisation of the steel sector.
The signatories expressed their support for the methodology developed by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), while arguing that the ambition level of the performance classes assigned to steel products under the Delegated Act should be significantly increased. According to the organisations, this is necessary to reduce Europe’s dependence on third countries and to direct investment toward low-carbon and fossil-free technologies.
The statement notes that the technology-neutral approach adopted by the JRC currently represents the most appropriate methodology for steering the transition toward low-carbon technologies. Based on a cradle-to-gate assessment and fixed performance thresholds, the system recognizes the decarbonisation potential of recycled steel scrap.
Unlike alternative methodologies that may discourage circularity and increase the European Union’s dependence on primary raw materials with a higher environmental footprint, the JRC approach is said to channel investments toward technologies that utilize the most sustainable raw materials and production processes. In this context, primary fossil-free steel production using hydrogen-based direct reduced iron (DRI) and electric arc furnace (EAF) technologies would be rewarded, helping to achieve EU climate and environmental objectives while avoiding lock-in effects associated with carbon-intensive technologies.
The statement further highlights that the JRC methodology would encourage investment in production pathways that strengthen Europe’s open strategic autonomy. By assigning a lower carbon footprint to products with high recycled content, demand for iron ore and concentrates—much of which is imported from outside the EU—would be reduced. The widespread availability of scrap in Europe is expected to support this transition and, even under increased demand, would not create supply shortages for European steel producers. As a result, dependence on third-country imports of primary raw materials could be significantly reduced.
The signatories also warned that adopting a different methodology at this stage could delay the implementation of the Green Steel Label and create additional uncertainty for investors. They noted that the JRC methodology is aligned with ongoing work under the ESPR framework for other materials, such as aluminium, through the use of the MEERP Life Cycle Assessment methodology, as well as with the Construction Products Regulation (CPR) framework. A different approach, they argued, would complicate the EU regulatory framework and potentially create unintended advantages for certain materials over others.
The statement additionally stresses that increasing the ambition level of performance thresholds is necessary to accelerate decarbonisation in steel production. While acknowledging that the JRC methodology provides a balanced framework, the organisations called for significantly stricter benchmarks for product-specific performance classes. They argued that the current thresholds are overly conservative and would not provide sufficient incentives for investment in low-carbon and fossil-free technologies if adopted under the Delegated Act.
According to the statement, the existing performance classes would be unable to drive meaningful market transformation or adequately distinguish products with the lowest carbon footprints.
Hot-rolled coil (HRC), a flat steel product predominantly produced within the EU through the blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) route, was cited as an example. The B performance class currently covers emissions ranging from 1.79 to 2.66 tCO₂eq per tonne of product, while the average carbon intensity of BF-BOF production within the EU is approximately 1.9 tCO₂eq per tonne. Consequently, a large share of existing facilities would already qualify for the B class without implementing additional emissions reductions, limiting the effectiveness of the classification system as a decarbonisation incentive.
A similar concern was raised regarding wire rod (WR), a long steel product. The statement noted that the B performance class would encompass both imported natural gas-based DRI-EAF products and BF-BOF products, despite the fact that a substantial portion of European wire rod production is already carried out through electric arc furnace (EAF) technology, which supports circular and lower-carbon production pathways. The signatories argued that fossil fuel-based production routes should not qualify under either the A or B performance classes.
Regarding the methodology used to establish the thresholds under the Delegated Act, the organisations proposed narrowing the eligibility criteria for public procurement under the A and B performance classes. Their objective is to ensure that only genuinely low-carbon and fossil-free steel products are rewarded, thereby creating stronger incentives for investment in advanced decarbonisation technologies.
Specifically, they proposed that only the top 10% most sustainable steel products should qualify for the A and B classes, and that a threshold of 400 kgCO₂eq per tonne of crude steel should separate the A-B classes from Class C. They argued that the currently proposed 30% threshold would allow carbon-intensive products to be labelled as “green,” creating misleading market signals and weakening incentives for further emissions reductions.
The signatories concluded that these proposed adjustments would make the performance classes more meaningful and ambitious while accelerating decarbonisation investments in the European steel sector and supporting the achievement of the EU’s climate objectives.
The statement’s footnotes also noted that replacing iron ore with recycled steel can reduce emissions by approximately 1.67 tonnes of CO₂ per tonne of steel produced and can save up to 72% of the energy required for primary steel production.
Furthermore, referencing the JRC’s 2025 report titled “Analysis of the EU Steel Supply Chain: Current Trends and Circularity Opportunities,” the organisations underlined that greater utilisation of steel scrap represents a significant opportunity to strengthen circularity within the European steel industry.

Author: SteelRadar Editorial Team

SteelRadar Logo

steelradar.com