CBAM, a carbon tariff for all carbon-intensive products imported into the European Union, was passed by the European Commission in December 2022 and its transitional phase began in October 2023.
Starting in October 2023, buyers of goods originating outside the EU must purchase certificates which equal the total emissions in the production of the goods.
There is no limit to the number of certificates that can be purchased to avoid restricting trade.
The cost of these certificates are calculated by the European Commission on a weekly basis according to the average price of the closing EU Emission Trading System (ETS) carbon dioxide (CO2) allowances for each week.
Impact of CBAM
CBAM can help to address imbalances related to European companies who are constrained by carbon taxes attempting to compete with countries who are not subject to any regulatory strictures, Louis Redshaw, Founder of Redshaw Advisors, told IREPAS attendees.
CBAM will help reduce carbon leakage, Redshaw said.
Carbon leakage was described when, for reasons of costs related to climate policies, businesses were to transfer production to other countries with more relaxed emission constraints, in turn resulting in an increase in their total emissions.
By placing a fair price on the carbon emitted during the production of all carbon-intensive products entering Europe, European mills, who currently need to pay for carbon credits equivalent to their carbon emissions, will be on a more equitable basis with importing countries who do not currently have the same taxes in place.
Some European market participants, however, were skeptical about how effective CBAM would be in rebalancing the playing field.
Carbon credits
European companies must buy carbon credits, normally from the government, to produce steel. When a company buys a carbon credit they can generate one ton of CO2 emissions.
The development of carbon credits turned carbon dioxide into a commodity, which could be monetized like any commodity.
Currently, the top 10% of the lowest emitting steel producers in Europe do not pay for carbon credits, while the remaining 90% of European steel producers have to pay varying amounts for carbon credits to offset their carbon emissions.
Pre-CBAM, European domestic mills were burdened by the cost of climate policies which non-EU countries were not, making them uncompetitive.
“CBAM will help to make competition fair. If importers are not taxed similarly to European mills, the European steel industry will die,” Redshaw said.
The greater a producer’s emission, the more they need to pay for carbon credits, thus incentivizing them to invest in decarbonizing processes.
By ensuring all countries importing steel into Europe have to pay similar amount, sustainable goals do not stop EU countries from being competitive or profitable.
Market responses
Many conference attendees felt that CBAM could help support European mills remain competitive when faced with so many economic challenges.
Some non-European exporters who were already providing CBAM certificates to buyers in Europe importing their stock, reported high levels of bureaucracy involved with submitting the correct information quarterly.
“It will help to put a fair price on the carbon emitted. Steel producers in Egypt who export to EU have already been asked to fill in necessary paperwork for CBAM. This is a very bureaucratic procedure and may become a burden in the future for producers,” a producer source from Egypt told Fastmarkets.
“CBAM will help support European mills and global targets towards becoming more sustainable,” a second producer source from Egypt said.
Skepticism
Some sources, especially in Europe, did not think CBAM would either encourage global decarbonization or significantly rebalance global markets.
CBAM has put a cost on carbon, but it is not enough to counter the other factors which have resulted in a lack of balance in the global markets, these sources said.
These factors included foreign country subsidies, lower gas and electricity costs, lower labor costs and lower or no regulations in the construction sector, the sources added.
These more skeptical market participants felt that by just putting a price on ‘carbon’, other key areas which required addressing were not being considered.
“Europe has been affected and limited by its own desire to become carbon efficient and this has been a contributing factor to Europe losing market share of steel production, weakening domestic demand and becoming uncompetitive domestically,” a German trader said.
Europe is currently trying to decarbonize, digitize and remain profitable, sources said. But, at least in the short term, the goal of decarbonizing is at odds with the goal of profitability, Fastmarkets heard.
“European producers don’t just have to deal with the carbon issue, they also have to deal with high energy costs because of high taxation on energy and renewable energy transformation and high energy costs and importing expensive raw materials and finding the money to invest in decarbonizing technology,” a producer source from Spain said.
Whereas there is a lot of pressure from every side to transition to low-carbon environment in Europe, this is not the same in non-EU countries.
In other countries, for example China and Algeria, where the steel industry is buoyed up by subsidies, carbon tariffs like CBAM will not incentivize them to decarbonize.
“China will just pay the increased costs with the massive government subsidies they receive. They will continue to emit just as much carbon and will continue to have far lower costs,” a trader at the conference said during a panel discussion.
“Even with CBAM and all countries importing into Europe having to pay for the cost of their carbon footprint, they still remain more competitive because of cheaper energy costs and cheaper labor costs,” a second producer source from Europe said.
