Pilot phase of Turkey’s ETS on track for 2025 launch: official

Turkey’s plans to launch its domestic compliance carbon market are on track, with a pilot phase set to start in early 2025, a senior official from the country’s Directorate of Climate Change said Dec. 3.

Speaking at S&P Global Commodity Insight’s Global Carbon Markets Conference in Barcelona, Huseyin Ayaz, who specializes in carbon pricing for the Turkish government, said the establishment of the country’s emissions trading system is moving in the right direction.

“We have completed all the preparation of the drafting process of the ETS, and we are waiting for its assent by the parliament,” said Ayaz, adding that some elements still need to be clarified and updated.

The pilot phase is scheduled to start at the beginning of next year, while the first implementation phase is set to run from 2027 to 2034.

Turkey’s ETS is expected to be similar to the EU Emissions Trading System — where CO2 emissions from regulated sectors have fallen by almost 40% since 2005, when the EU ETS was launched — while also raising billions of euros in revenue from government auctions of carbon allowances.

Turkey’s industrial sectors — refining, metals, chemicals and cement — can be very carbon intensive, and analysts expect the Turkish ETS to have a similar effect as the EU’s carbon market, boosting the uptake of renewable energy and reducing demand for coal and oil-fired electricity generation, while encouraging cleaner technologies across emitting industries.

Currently, the draft ETS regulation mentions that allocated allowances will be distributed to obligated operators within the scope of the ETS through an auction method. These allocations can then be traded in the secondary market, which will be overseen by Turkey’s largest energy exchange EPIAS.

 

Reality of CBAM

Ayaz also acknowledged that the impact of EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism on the Turkey’s industrial sector will be felt, and having a domestic carbon market will help it manage this risk.

“We know that CBAM is reality for us. We are a candidate country for CBAM as our companies have a huge amount of trade with the EU,” he added.

With the EU’s CBAM set to come into its definitive phase from 2026, Turkish exporters face higher costs, as nearly half of all exports go to the EU.

The EU mechanism imposes a carbon tariff on emission-intensive commodities imported by the EU, including aluminum, cement, electricity, fertilizers, hydrogen, iron and steel. The aim is to level the playing field for EU companies, as most exporting countries do not have a carbon price as high as EU ETS, or do not have a price on emissions at all.

Carbon-pricing programs like the EU ETS are considered an effective and economic way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. As of mid-2024, there were 75 carbon taxes or emissions trading systems in operation, according to the World Bank.

Carbon prices currently vary significantly on a country-to-country basis as there is no global carbon price. Carbon permits under the EU ETS are around five times more expensive than compliance prices in China, the industrial powerhouse of the world.

Platts, part of S&P Global Commodity Insights, assessed EU Allowances for December 2024 at Eur68.73/mtCO2e ($72.35/mtCO2e) Dec. 2. This compared with China’s compliance emissions price, which was valued at Yuan 102.38 mtCO2e ($14.24/mtCO2e) on Nov. 29, according to the Shanghai Environment and Energy Exchange.

Eklavya Gupte

 

How will the EU’s CBAM impact global iron and steel?

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism has big implications for international trade patterns.

While it’s an EU regulation, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) aims to encourage decarbonisation at a global level. As the new rules will affect anyone who exports to the EU, it promises to have significant consequences for international trade. 

In our latest insight, our metals and mining sector analysts set out the details of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and assess its implications for the iron and steel sector, which is the largest by import value of the six sectors covered by the first phase of the scheme.

Fill out the form to download a free extract from the report, or read on for an overview that touches on the implications for other commodities. 

What is the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism? 

The CBAM aims to address the issue of so-called ‘carbon leakage’. The EU defines carbon leakage as ‘the situation that may occur if, for reasons of costs related to climate policies, businesses were to transfer production to other countries with laxer emission constraints’.1 The EU looks to address the risk of carbon leakage by taxing imports to equalise the carbon price paid by EU and non-EU products. 

What sectors does it cover? 

Initially, the CBAM will cover six sectors, with a focus on carbon-intensive and trade-exposed industries that are at the high risk of carbon leakage. These are electricity, hydrogen, cement, fertilisers, aluminium, and iron and steel. Later it will be extended to all sectors covered by the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) by 2030. The bloc will also assess whether to extend the mechanism to organic chemicals and polymers by the end of the transition period, and will look at the potential to cover indirect emissions for more sectors and a wider range of downstream products. 

When does it come into effect? 

  • October 2023 – Transitional period: Importers of products covered by the initial scope only have reporting obligations for the purpose of the CBAM 
  • January 2026 – Financial obligations commence: Importers will face financial obligations of surrendering CBAM certificates, which will ramp up progressively. Free allowances for CBAM-targeted sectors under the EU ETS will start to phase out. 
  • On or before 2030 – Extension: Regulations will be widened to all sectors covered by the EU ETS  
  • By 2034 – Full implementation: The CBAM will reach full effect for the initial batch of sectors and allowances will be all allocated via auctions for these sectors under the EU ETS 

How will it work? 

Until now, industrial installations within the EU considered to be at significant risk of carbon leakage have been receiving free allowances under the EU ETS to support their competitiveness. The CBAM will replace these free allocation, which will be phased out between 2026 and 2034 at the same pace as the CBAM is phased in. 

CBAM financial obligations will be determined by the embedded emissions of imported goods and the price of the CBAM certificate, which is based on the EU ETS price. Carbon price effectively paid in the export country can be deducted (see diagram below). 

Why has iron and steel been chosen? 

The iron and steel sector is large, trade exposed and emissions intensive, making it a prime candidate for inclusion in the CBAM. European producers face significant competition, with 30% of EU demand for steel basic materials and key intermediates met by foreign supply. Price is a major factor, with EU steel producers facing higher production costs than their foreign competitors. As the energy transition progresses, higher carbon prices will further corrode their competitiveness. 

Emissions from crude steel production in most of the bloc’s major steel trade partners, including China, India and Russia, are notably higher than the EU average, yet none of these countries places a carbon price as high as the EU’s. The CBAM is intended to address this discrepancy and create a level playing field for domestic production. The mechanism will cover CO2 emissions from a range of imported products, including pig iron, semi-finished and finished steel, some fabricated steel, and downstream items like nuts, bolts and screws. 

What will the impacts of the CBAM be? 

In the long term, the CBAM could lead to global decarbonisation of affected sectors and downstream consumption. However, collateral damage should also be expected. 

Cost growth will be moderate in the first few years of the CBAM payment. During this period, exporters to the EU could reorganise their production and sales to direct lower-emissions products to the European market as a short-term fix. However, they may simply avoid the higher cost of operating in the EU market, creating supply shortages. Meanwhile, carbon costs will rise for EU producers as free allowances are phased out. 

In the longer term, however, carbon will become an increasingly important cost component to consider. This will eventually impact steel trading patterns and encourage exporters to the EU to invest in emissions reduction technology. At the same time, the bloc’s trading partners will be incentivised to introduce or raise their own domestic carbon prices to prevent revenue leakage (although it should be noted that they are likely to remain structurally weaker than the EU’s).  

On the downside, higher carbon costs and disrupted supplies will impact downstream manufacturing, leading almost inevitably to price increases for both domestic and foreign products. Steel is also widely used for renewable energy applications such as wind turbines and electric vehicles; higher prices and added strain on the supply chain could, therefore, make the energy transition more expensive in the EU than elsewhere.  

Learn more: Implications of the CBAM for the iron and steel sector

EUROMETAL whitepaper: Towards a CO2 neutral steel – The current situation

EUROMETAL have been publishing a whitepaper annually on topics relevant to steel distributors but also to the entire supply chain.

This year we have made it our mission to address the sustainability and decarbonization of our industry.
We are pleased to announce our Whitepaper “Towards a CO2 neutral steel – The current situation”.

This document is divided into chapters:

  • Initial considerations on green steel
  • Alternative production technologies
  • The EU emissions trading system
  • Marketing the low emission steels
  • Checking CO2 on imports with CBAM

EUROMETAL aims, with this document, to shed light on the challenges encountered by the European steel industry, both exploring some technological options and explaining the current legal framework for CO2 emissions.

 

MEPs: Put a carbon price on certain EU imports to raise global climate ambition

To raise global climate ambition and prevent ‘carbon leakage’, the EU must place a carbon price on certain imports from less climate-ambitious countries, say MEPs.

On Wednesday, Parliament adopted a resolution on a WTO-compatible EU carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) with 444 votes for, 70 against and 181 abstentions.

The resolution underlines that the EU’s increased ambition on climate change must not lead to ‘carbon leakage’ as global climate efforts will not benefit if EU production is just moved to non-EU countries that have less ambitious emissions rules.

MEPs therefore support to put a carbon price on certain goods imported from outside the EU, if these countries are not ambitious enough about climate change. This would create a global level playing field as well as an incentive for both EU and non-EU industries to decarbonise in line with the Paris Agreement objectives.

MEPs stress that it should be WTO-compatible and not be misused as a tool to enhance protectionism. It must therefore be designed specifically to meet climate objectives. Revenues generated should be used as part of a basket of own revenues to boost support for the objectives of the Green Deal under the EU budget, they add.

Mechanism to be linked to a reformed EU Emissions Trading System (ETS)

The new mechanism should be part of a broader EU industrial strategy and cover all imports of products and commodities covered by the EU ETS. MEPs add that already by 2023, and following an impact assessment, it should cover the power sector and energy-intensive industrial sectors like cement, steel, aluminium, oil refinery, paper, glass, chemicals and fertilisers, which continue to receive substantial free allocations, and still represent 94 % of EU industrial emissions.

They add that linking carbon pricing under the CBAM to the price of EU allowances under the EU ETS will help to combat carbon leakage but underline that the new mechanism must not lead to double protection for EU installations.

You can watch a video of the plenary debate here.

Quote

After the vote, Parliament rapporteur Yannick Jadot (Greens/EFA, FR) said:

“The CBAM is a great opportunity to reconcile climate, industry, employment, resilience, sovereignty and relocation issues. We must stop being naïve and impose the same carbon price on products, whether they are produced in or outside the EU, to ensure the most polluting sectors also take part in fighting climate change and innovate towards zero carbon. This is our best chance of remaining below the 1.5°C warming limit, whilst also pushing our trading partners to be equally ambitious in order to enter the EU market.

Next steps

The Commission is expected to present a legislative proposal on a CBAM in the second quarter of 2021 as part of the European Green Deal as well as a proposal on how to include the revenue generated to finance part of the EU budget.

Background

Parliament has played an important role in pushing for more ambitious EU climate legislation. It declared a climate emergency on 28 November 2019 and wants the EU and its member states to become climate neutral in 2050 and reduce GHG emissions with 60% by 2030.

Source: europarl.europa.eu